Keith J. Clark

English subtitles on both videos...the one on Alberto's channel and the one on our channel

ah, you drew what you saw also! I have often wanted to do that but dont have the skills. Cool!

and thank you for your volunteer work Christine

lol, these sounds are so freakish I suggest you keep the recordings in a separate folder - in case one day we can use them for videos! I still hold firm to the idea that the noise dictates our response. I've grown accustomed to any voice and whenever I think I hear something negative I realize Im emotionally involved, then I pull back to an objective state. There are times where some tones have the ability to cause panic attacks for those sensitive, like you and me. I just experienced that the other night. so I changed the tone. the second, 4th, and 5th samples seem to hold the most promise

I don't believe in coincidences

Hi Andres, is there a way to limit the range in which the tone varies? For example, to first keep it between 80-400hz to get closer to human speech patterns. I presume we're not able to input a sound sample and the randomness of the circuit determines the tone? Good stuff. imagine if you had 7 of these devices running in parallel...each limiting its fundamental or harmonic base tone to stay within the defined range. For example: Fundamental 100-200Hz 1st Harmonic 200-300Hz 2nd harmonics 300-400Hz The spacing between the tones is anywhere from 1-100Hz with no overlap. Just thinking out loud of ways to modify this to keep freqs within typical human voice range Great experiment!

On this part below - YES!! Jeff calls this dynamism as far as I remember. basically it means that static tones left alone will not produce spirit voices, we always need to add what I call speech patterns which are impulse groups having the shape of a voice envelope function Right, we have to pass it through a mutable/modulatable (made-up word) medium whether it be sound, light, radio waves, impulse, other tones OR randomization such as evpmaker, granulizer software.

Thanks Jeff, really appreciate the detailed response! You reminded me I have the allophones back from when Mr. Bion created them. Thinking I can modify it. Playing with it right now

interesting Jeff!

I havent seen the show but did note the reference to Bigelow as an aerospace magnate recently. I found that fact quite intriguing.

My responses from my personal experience: 1. Do you find that when you ask a question you often get multiple responses (from both m and f sounding voices)? How many? unlimited. could be anyone 2. Do you find that responses come in multiple iterations before they are inteligible? -as if they are attempting to locate or formulate the words from phonemes, or etc. How many does it take for words to be clear? its our technique that defines the clarity 3. Have you been able to seemingly 'teach' voices to say specific words? no, but they do reply 4. Do some locations seem more active than others? no, I can be anywhere in the world. streams never change based upon my location. 5. Do specific times seem more active than others? no, though late at night my brain seems attuned to hearing more, when the ear and mind are attuneed after a day of practice. 6. Do responses often seem precognitive? not exactly, though they do seem to express hopes of what they think the future holds 7. Do responses often repeat elements of the question? not for me. 8. Other patterns? any sound, anywhere. all of it can be modulated. we just have to fine tune our spirits and energies as well as technological methods.

sounds like a wobble function!

Marie, got any audio samples ? would love to hear them!

I was disappointed at first but then halfway through the video Alberto came through with good examples of Ouija mediumship! excellent journalism on behalf of both Alberto and Victor Zammit. personally, I ain't afraid of no Ouija board

hi Lootje, welcome to the forum! can see you're a "team player" and we hope to learn from you as well! P.S. is that a picture of Swedenborg?

Hello everyone. As I continue the work that began 16 years ago I've decided to share some basics with you. The hope is that you will think of some creative solutions to the principles outlined below which are the result of my experiments over a long period of time. With your creativity I believe we can crack this long-term project to achieve at least one-way real-time voice communication. We've been successful in creating voice through many various methods and what we lack is a unified approach based upon these principles. I'm hoping for your creative solutions in response to the principles I mention. Please consider that I don't have the technical experience most of you have, my solutions are a combination of intuition and trial and error. So you may need to translate into your own understanding when thinking of a potential solution. The goal here, as I present it, is to mimic human voice. From there, it will be a piece of cake. 1. Voice requires a fundamental frequency with a fundamental frequency amplitude louder than the rest of the harmonics 2. Additional harmonics need to be shaped to be similar to reproduction of a human voice OR a perfect averaged voice sample may be provided. Harmonics should never be of the same amplitude as the fundamental. Tones need to be balanced. Without balance it will never be feasible. This may require tuning by ear. 3. Modulation is required to simulate a glottal pulse and the vocal folds. I dont know if its 20Hz etc, but if we determined this we would be much closer. 4. Comb filter (delay with reverb) can also simulate a fundamental with harmonics, but the harmonics would need to be toned down to simulate human voice. Overtones come into play. 5. Impulse train (modulation) is critical and when combined with combfilter is very powerful 6. Granulized sounds (short samples of sound) can be used reliably as long as a voice is shaped per number 2 above. Usage of the tool "Emissions Control" has proven this theory. 7. EVPMaker set to 140-600ms with X-fade option only will also produce a randomized form of speech that produces a single voice. If pulsecomb (combfilter (delay + reverb) plus impulse train (modulation) is used in post-processing of randomized sound (live or recorded) this can be a very powerful tool 8. Software enhancement. We have the ability now to enhance noise reduction and live filtering which in essence can allow sound to be heard that is imperceptible to human ears. Bias Soundsoap has improved greatly, as well as the introduction of Krisp artificial intelligence. 9. One idea that works is to provide voice is 2 tones spaced 2.5Hz apart. It is not known yet why this is. When tones 2.5 Hz apart are randomized a certain phenomenon happens. It's either a meditative state or conducive to speech patterns we are already trained to recognize. We don't know yet. to hear what that sounds like, listen to Stream 7 aka "Crystal trainer" Please feel free to provide your creative interpretations of how we can simulate human voice. I am happy to demonstrate any of the principles outlined above for a better understanding. One of my shortcomings has been not taking the time to explain the ground already covered. With your help I am confident we can crack this long-term goal. Summary: We will have synthesized software "voiceboxes" that spirit can use. The fact is we already have this technology. Trial and error has shown that in order to hear a reproduction of a human voice an experimental sound needs to have some sort of randomization or be "energized" through a variety of methods. In the end though - it must mimic human voice characteristics. In order to create a voice template for spirit we can refer back to human voice samples and provide a template that mimics normal human speech. This should be done visually as well as listening. Different methods can be used such as: granulization, "energize" using a combination of combfilter (delay + reverb), or randomize using software such as EVPmaker. ALL of these efforts have shown the same principles to be true. In short - do you have ideas for reproducing a human voice without intelligible signal information? I am happy to credit anyone that contributes to this work. My biggest challenge is that I have not taken the time to explain what I've learned so that it may be expanded upon by other creative people. And when I explain it in technical terms it falls short of what most people would understand or resonate with. Feel free to add your comments and suggestions as to how to reproduce a human voice. I would find it helpful if you would consider the principles I placed above and let me know what questions you have regarding any of the items presented. it is my hope that together, once and for all, we can crack this code. We already have all of the tools needed in our possession. We just need to work together. And I've held my ideas too close to my chest for too long. What questions/suggestions do you have? I'm open to anything, as most of you know. Don't be shy We have already succeeded partially with voice.....lets take it the rest of the way! I'm happy to demonstrate any of the methods mentioned or presented to anyone that has interest to better explain the concepts. Keith Clark Synthetic - Oct27 Private - Clip1 part of the arrangement of the tones automate the machine its a system that is izing with music.mp3 NoisegenPulsecomb.mp3

Hi Christine, the sample doesnt seem to be found. Can you upload it again?

It's currently streaming with Krisp on stream 5 for a limited time (don't have all my resources back up): https://www.varanormal.com/streamsfolder/stream5/

Perfect Andres, I'll hook something up tonight with it. I hear it's nice and loud at the moment.

Very nice video! I was watching the first half and thinking "oh no, ouija boards are only bad" and then the next thing I know you began to share good examples. Prime entertainment in an educational format! Superb! We hope to see more from you.

You guys...this is some amazing stuff! I'm able to make out some of the audio. If either of you wants to live stream or have me set you up with live filtering just let me know in a private message or email good work!

"You can make it beautiful with singing." A helpful tip for radio experiments. XRecorder_11122021_013310.mp4