ALF

Oh my! I can hear it both ways now. My original, & "Yes this is Amy over here". It must be in Layers. I've accepted "layers" as a reasonable explanation as to why people could hear words differently from the same clip, but this example really solidifies it for me. The last word in each perceived version doesn't even line up. But I can hear it either way. Amazing! My clips don't have any enhancements. I'm unfamiliar with using them other than amplify & tempo. I get a lot of communication. Imagine what I've been missing! Regarding the 36 second delay from feed to ears, though spirit gave an instantaneous response to my question "Is this Amy?", could this simply be possible because there is no time/space on their end? That's not to say that I disagree about their ability to know our thoughts. I have enough evidence to accept that they can. In a different recording, I've had a spirit tell me that he could feel me when I am grounding. That is one of my pre-session preparations. So what would that imply? My understanding is that they know each other in the spirit world by their energy. My theory is that our energy also has a vibration that may function the same way. They can sense ours, and some of us here who are sensitive to it can sense the signature vibration of others on the earthly plain. Today, I was watching a Youtube video of Tom Campbell on reincarnation and the afterlife. Tom is a Physicist and conscientiousness researcher, and one of the founders of the Monroe Institute. Because of his decades of Astral Projection experiences he has concluded that we basically reboot right away, we don't hang around to greet our relatives when they pass. And that it is the Larger Conscientiousness System that supplies the experience out of their data base of relatives greeting their loved ones to help them with their transition. If this were true, then could it mean that when we work with EVP that it too is just out of a data base and available to us for, spiritual advancement? Andrea Ron, There is a lot of interesting stuff in this session. Today I'm only going to focus on the 1 min 18 sec mark through the end at 1 min 35.9 sec. I waited until 1 min 18 sec into the recording to speak. I just didn't think of it until then, probably because I was listening intently to see if I could pick up something in real time. I hadn't prepared anything to say, so I just said "Is this Amy?" She has been known to hang out on this feed. While I was speaking those 3 words, the spirit personalities started reacting and they continued without taking a breath, straight through the end of the recording. It went like this: me: Is this Amy? (at the same time) them: We know you. them: What's your name? I already hear you. them: We're here. them: I'm aware you're here. them: We know you are already there, we know you're here. them: We hear you from there Amy: but It's the way you feel. I believe that it is Amy's voice at the very end of the recording. Darn, that's when it was really getting interesting too!. They not only can hear us, but according to Amy they also get information about us by how we feel to them. I have had a sense that certain spirit personalities hang around a specific feed. I'm wondering if any of you have noticed that. Besides Amy, there are others there. I separated them above when the speaker seemed to change.

ST Amy 5.23.23 we hear you from there but it's the way you feel.wav

Ron, There is a lot of interesting stuff in this session. Today I'm only going to focus on the 1 min 18 sec mark through the end at 1 min 35.9 sec. I waited until 1 min 18 sec into the recording to speak. I just didn't think of it until then, probably because I was listening intently to see if I could pick up something in real time. I hadn't prepared anything to say, so I just said "Is this Amy?" She has been known to hang out on this feed. While I was speaking those 3 words, the spirit personalities started reacting and they continued without taking a breath, straight through the end of the recording. It went like this: me: Is this Amy? (at the same time) them: We know you. them: What's your name? I already hear you. them: We're here. them: I'm aware you're here. them: We know you are already there, we know you're here. them: We hear you from there Amy: but It's the way you feel. I believe that it is Amy's voice at the very end of the recording. Darn, that's when it was really getting interesting too!. They not only can hear us, but according to Amy they also get information about us by how we feel to them. I have had a sense that certain spirit personalities hang around a specific feed. I'm wondering if any of you have noticed that. Besides Amy, there are others there. I separated them above when the speaker seemed to change. Because of the file size limit I won't be able to attach much. I'll attach one clip here, and I'll cheat a little and add a post below it with a second one. I should look into a file host. What do you use? Andrea ST Amy 5.23.23 Is this Amy:we know you, what's your name we already...wav

Oh thank God! I'm not going crazy!

Ron, Does this sound like Amy's voice at the end? I hear "I want to thank you for praying on me". Be careful of your volume at first if using earbuds. Andrea ST Amy 5.23.23 I want to thank you for praying on me.wav

Great! I'll post my results. Thank you, Ron.

Ron, Does the child Amy speak in the same voice as the others or does she sound like a child? Andrea

Here are a couple more clips from the same session. I'm wondering if you can hear what I hear. It would be really helpful if you could tell me what you hear. They seem to speak at a fast pace. Thank you. SpirT 3.18.23 I can feel you.wav SpitT 3.18.23 you are needed here.wav SpirT 3.18.23 I don't know if we're getting her.wav

Karyn, I thought you might be interested to hear a story that my husband has told. The details I'm repeating he still remembers clearly. He remembers becoming self aware at a certain point in the womb. At that moment, he realized where he was and thought, "Oh no, not this again. This is so hard." And at the same time feeling something around his neck and tugging at it. He doesn't remember the labor or actually being born but remembers the doctor hanging him upside down and that he was crying because of it. He also remembers them making a footprint and that they needed to redo it because it had smudged. As a young child, he told his mother about this memory and she confirmed that there was an issue with the umbilical cord and the footprint. I wonder if he was having second thoughts about his life plan while in the womb! Andrea

Thank you for the encouragement DanSmith. I have another intriguing event to report! (At least I think so.) It is in reference to the English Male phoneme sound file I made using the ITC Station tab/Audio at the top of this website. As I mentioned in my previous post above, I had recorded this file to use as additional background noise in a Sound Chopper session. Well, as I reported above, I made a mistake and subsequently, that sound file wasn't used until I recorded a SC session the next day. In the mean time, I decided to listen to the original phoneme file. I wanted to share one clip from that file in particular. You can find it attached below. "You're gonna talk with the dead". Well, I was planning to do that using this recording as background sound in another session. Was this predictive on their part? Is it written (as I often hear the spirit personalities say)? I believe this is additional evidence that supports my theory that they can read our thoughts. That sounds creepy, let's say, our intention. Thoughts that we pad with energy. I was going to say "Thoughts?", but.... Andrea 1.28.23 you're gonna talk with the d.wav

Hi Ron, Thank you for bringing back the SpiriTron live streaming. I had a chance to check it out last month. I did not knowingly interact with program but still had somewhat of a personal experience. Though I did not speak, I did think about the spirit world prior to starting and I always assume that I will find communication on the recording. A result of intention, I guess. I did not hear from Amy but my recording was only 19 seconds. I'll make a longer recording next time and we'll see what happens! I read that you are trying to improve the sound output quality. That would be great if you could, but it's still a solid for making a connection. I've attached a couple of the clearer clips. There are some longer ones that don't meet the allowable file size. I can send them to you if you'd like. Best to use earbuds. Andrea SpirT 3.18.23 we know you.wav SpirT 3.18.23 there's a man in love with you here.wav SpirT 3.18.23 He's lying to you.wav

I haven't noticed any posts regarding the ITC Station tab up above, and specifically the Audio choice on the sub-menu. I made a recording and upon review, found that the results and the feel of them were so strangely different than everything else I've recorded through other avenues. Not necessarily better, although I didn't need any amplification and there were no layers of communication to confuse you. Just... peculiar. It's difficult to explain, and your mileage may vary but you may want to try it yourself. I changed the settings from the default to 120, 150, 100, 1 (left that one alone). If you want it to be in reverse, you need to engage that before selecting a language. Next press Play. I couldn't get the record function to work using Chrome so I pulled up Audacity to make the recording. I created an English Male phonem sound file (similar to gibberish) in reverse with the app I mentioned above. I saved it and then played it as a sound source for added background noise in a Sound Chopper session. (This app made by Andres Ramos is my favorite because of it's versatility and results.) I've had good results with the SC using just my voice in a questions/answer format, but I wondered what would happen if I added a little something extra. I started the session by voicing a welcome, invitation list and stated my intention. After that, I announced that I was going to add some Male Gibberish sounds to see if that could assist them in forming words. I wasn't aware at the time, but I had forgotten to remove my earbuds which I had put on to select the settings on the app before I began. So I was the only one hearing the gibberish and it wasn't being recorded. Directly after I made that statement, a spirit made the comment I've attached below. The Sound Chopper can make (if you elect it) a Source recording as well as the recording which receives a PK treatment. This clip is from the PK track, and created from an opportunity presented because of the PK treatment. The spirit isn't switching up my voice or the using the gibberish (because it wasn't audible and playing). I wasn't aware of my gibberish mishap until I reviewed the session. It's pretty good quality & the spirit uses emotion to express his dissatisfaction with my error. He isn't answering a question or making a general statement, and it's not related to a memory of mine. His comment was in direct response to what was occurring at that moment. For me, it's thought provoking. PK_1.28.23 you're just an idiot aren't you.wav

Hi Tom, These clips are interesting. The following is what I can hear. (Lines 1-4, Columns A-C) 1B Jim Stanford (this one sounds like someone speaking their name) 1C I found car 2C I hope your ____ transitions before we lose it 3A Goodbye/Goodbye (the second goodbye spoken by spirit)(this is a good one!) 3B I want you guys out of here 4C Bob will pay At the end of the long female clip (A1) I can hear "bring her up" 4 times at the end of the clip. I didn't know if you copied it 4x, or if the voice is really insistent about getting (her) up there! I believe you are getting voices here but the source sound sure isn't my favorite. It's not easy on the ears! Andrea

Pat, what device are you using? An ipad or iphone? If it's an ipad, I have one and could test to see if I can save on it. Let me know, I'm happy to test it. Sound Chopper works perfectly on my Macbook Pro laptop. Andrea

Hi Tom, I definitely have experienced layering before, but I haven't heard anything like this. What do you hear them saying? Is it that they want you to know something? It sounds super compressed. More so than I've ever heard before, and kind of robotic sounding. Alien possibly? What was your sound source and set up? Andrea

Very, very interesting Andres! I agree with you on the opinion that messages contain different layered content, depending on the listener. I also believe that sometimes it is what I like to call, a set-up. Orchestrated by the spirits. The reason Interval is so clear is because that's my voice (unless you are hearing them repeat it). I hear them say GO UP in between me saying "Interval " and "is at 56". I see my error now, I should have used quotes before and it would have been clearer. Andrea

Thank you for posting these Karen. Right timing for me to find them and hold meaning for me. Andrea

Thank you Andres. I'm going to send you the fully documented session write up when I finalize it. I have since made a couple more recordings with the Sound Chopper. With the second one I was just trying to make a test with my voice to get a better idea of how the app works and not trying to record an official session, so there were no questions and no pre-session prep. I read aloud the settings I was using, "Input pre-amp is at 3.5; Interval is at 56", etc., and went through all of the settings, and then stopped the recording. I also elected to record the secondary Source track at the same time. Upon review, something really interesting occurred. It seems that the spirits left their opinion on the settings I was using! I'm attaching a few examples. I suggest you use earbuds or headphones because the quality isn't great but their communication in this way has value. Decay is at .9 WE PICKED IT (PK version, they changed up my voice) Threshold is at 64 A LITTLE BIT MORE (PK version, notice the echo sound preceding their message this happens often with this app) Interval GO UP is at 56 (Source version) They had a comment for each of the settings, some more or less difficult to make out. There were a couple of other messages of personal interest to me. One of them I will share that may be of interest to you too, either because of the messages or the mechanics of how it was delivered. At the very beginning of the recording, at point 0 to 1.037 and before I start speaking, I hear a male voice say NO ONE'S AWARE OF IT ALL. I believe he used, and maybe enhanced my breath as his source of sound. If you listen closely you will hear me take a breath. You may need to listen a few times to hear this profound message and of importance to me as I'm always asking questions looking for answers as to how things work. If you can't hear it, maybe it's just meant for me. Andrea PK_Recording 10.29.22 settings test We picked it.wav PK_Recording 10.29.22 settings test A little bit more.wav Source 10.29.22 settings test interval (go up).wav PK_Recording 10.29.22 settings test no one's aware of it all.wav

Hi Kevin, You have some strong and clear voice captures! Very nice! I hear a few of your clips differently than you do. I had to tell you because what I hear is really sweet and makes me smile. In the first clip you ask, "Do you hear me my friends?" I hear the answer, "You love us." "What would they guess" I hear, "I've been wanting grandkids." "He is good." I hear "He lives for it." "This is (listen?) Kevin" I hear, "I miss you desperately." I either hear what you hear or can't make it out on the balance of them. I have a few questions for you if you don't mind. Did you happen to write down your settings? I'm curious as to what they were and how you went about choosing your settings? I believe they might be able to use the settings on their own, and maybe they are trying to tell you that in the clips, "I'm testing" & "work it soon". A few of my clips using the Sound Chopper could be interpreted that way as well. We should pay attention to that and listen for similar statements going forward. Andrea

I watched Andres You Tube video about his Sound Chopper device and decided to try it. I'm not sure that I was using it properly, and after my test I learned from Andres that the app is not the best set up for the question /answer format I use, but still the results turned out good and so I wanted to present them. First off, I made the mistake of not checking which microphone my computer was pointing to. As Andres tells us in the video, this app will not give you a prompt to choose, you direct it from your computer settings. So for this test I was using the Krisp (noise canceling) microphone live throughout without realizing it. Keep in mind the possible affects the Krisp microphone may play when considering my results. I started with a 37 second recording, stopped and changed the app settings and then started another separate recording for 1 minute 41 seconds I made the election on the app to add the additional Source recording to both. I don't know if Krisp would have affected the Source recording also or just the PK recording. Maybe Andres can tell us. The app settings were as follows: 1st recording Source 4.7 Randomizer 40 50 Reverb 1.3 .8 0 .4 2nd recording Source 6.8 Randomizer 54 64 Reverb 1.3 .8 .16 1.4 When reviewing the recordings in Audacity, I imported both the PK & Source recordings as separate tracks so that they are stacked. When listening to one, you need to mute the other with the button on the left. If you use and then apply the tempo effect to make a clip, b sure to reverse it in Edit or your tracks will no longer line up. Applying amplify does not cause this problem. It's important that they do as it's a valuable tool for comparison in a number of ways. I used the magnifier to stretch the scale out into 1/5ths when reviewing. The Results I expected that the sound of my voice asking the questions would be "chopped up" and available for the spirits to manipulate into messages. For this reason I didn't leave much time for their reply, and I spoke at a slow pace. I did this for both recordings. In both PK tracks, there were some instances where the spirits changed up my chopped voice into their own words. All but one or maybe two of them were in the second recording though. Sometimes it sounded like my voice, and other times like someone else. When I checked the Source track at the same location, the change up was recorded there too. You can hear my question with the spirit change up in the background. I didn't know this would happen but this is great because it helps to identify the change up that sounded like my voice in the PK track as spirit and not just my voice getting the PK treatment, as there is no app treatment to the Source recording. But the change up is there too. I realize this explanation might sound confusing if you haven't used the app yet. It is harder to make a really good clip of this occurrence in the Source recording side because of this overlap of voices (mine & spirit's). Once I discovered this happening, I started making clips of the messages in both PK & Source versions, and to my surprise, sometimes the PK was the clearer version and sometimes the Source was clearer! Even though I didn't get much "change up" in the first recording, there were still messages in the blank areas, the small pauses in my voice after asking a question. Mostly all of these blank space message in the first recording were difficult to make out. They were in tones & impulses. I would be guessing at most of them but I got a sense of what they were saying. They were somewhat better quality in the second recording. I assume the choice of different app effects helped. It also did seem like the spirits learned to work with the app as it went along, and may even have been able to use and control the effects. And there was an answer to one of my questions that makes me think they can do this. It would explain the variety of sounds, methods & voice qualities. They answered questions with reasonable responses in relation to the questions, as far as I can tell. I wouldn't say that is specific to this device, but the app did work for me for this purpose. I really enjoyed the new experience which caused me t5o think differently to adapt to this app. I'm pleased with the results! I took a lot of time in reviewing and found that the results were different than I had initially thought was happening. Next time I'll make sure the Krisp microphone is off! Of the questions I asked, a few of them may be of general interest. As usual, the answers are as I hear them. You may hear something different. Heck, sometimes I hear something different when I go back and listen on another day. But I do know, its spirit communication. Can all people in spirit communicate this way?: YES; YA I've asked this question before and got: WELL THEY KNOW HOW What do you think of this EVP device?: I CAN CHANGE IT (I'm asking about the Sounder Chopper app) I've attached this clip. It is the PK version, which is a little better than the Source version in this case. I did not separate the question from the response because I think it's really interesting how quickly the response was made & immediately after the question. It does make it a little more difficult to hear though. To catch it, you might have to listen to my annoying voice a little more often than you care to. If the answer is cut off, I'll add a leader on the end and repost it. (Or in other words, do it correctly, not the lazy way.) Do you have thoughts on how to make it better?: YOU'RE USING IT NOW; JUST GIVE IT TIME I'm often asking questions about energy and how to boost it for their communication. This time I think I got a good tip: TIME IT I have suspected that shorter session help them manage their available energy better. Maybe that's what this means. I'll try it! There was a random statement, before questions were asked that made no sense to me but might to someone here so I attached it. Is anyone here a pilot? Thank you Andres, for another great research tool. PK What do you think..I can change it.wav Source time it.wav PK_Recording. I met the pilot.wav

Karyn, thank you. This comprehensive information is very useful and an important reference for anyone working with EVP, and also serves as a good reminder. My pre-session process that I use when working from home has a basic outline, though my words/thoughts that make up each section within the outline continues to evolve. I'm working with Audacity for recording & review. So when I am working from home I follow a process. I have been reckless when recording outside of the house and will need to adapt a similar practice. 0. I decide on the length of the session upfront, as well has the noise source. 1. I imagine cleansing with white light & grounding into the earth. 2. Mentally say an invocation/prayer, and request any special spiritual helpers I'd like to be present. 3. Raise and expand my energy. 4. I open my laptop and type an overall intention which is usually the same for several sessions in a row, and after that a specific intention for this session. If I'm extending any specific invitations, I type them there. Under that I type a greeting. After that I type out several questions that I intend to ask that will fit into my set timeframe while still allowing some time between them for answers. Finally, I type a closing by thanking them. At that point, I'm ready to begin the session process.

Hello Andres, I will think about how to do this. There was an interesting coincidence that occurred within a few days regarding one of the images I posted. I was reading "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" by Tesla. A short time later, without thinking about Telsa or the book, I captured an image of what I thought looked like Tesla's parted hair, forehead, eyebrows & eyes (one of the images I posted at the beginning of this thread). And then a short time after that, I was recording an EVP session and captured "Nikola's going to follow you" and something about cancel fusion, can't master. It is interesting to ponder.

Hello Andres, Your information above brings up a lot of thoughts as I go back and apply it to my experiences, thank you for the information. You mentioned that in your experience, using Krisp (I'm assuming for after-processing) was a double edge sword so to speak. I believe I've had similar experiences with lower dimension content. Without giving the content too much energy, I'll just say the voices were clear and intelligent, but were playing on my fears. I try not to be, but it does bother me. Understanding how these voices come in afterwords during the second recording through Krisp helps me. I don't want to toss Krisp out because of the positive reasons you mentioned. I have an idea. I follow a structure in preparing for a session and part of that is to clearly state my intention in writing being very specific, and I also write a prayer. For the most part, I seem to be successful at taking control of the sessions' content by doing this. But, I've never thought to do it when running a second recording through Krisp, or when recording sounds of nature for later use as background noise. I'll test it and let you know.