Arizona EVP

Quote

 

Welcome to the forum. Lots of good peeps here to try and answer any questions you may have.

As far as your clip....here's one filtered version of what I got.

It starts at about 5 seconds and what I hear is a lower pitch response that seems to say  You Found Me

The clip and interpretation pic is attached.

Ron

080921_Recording_Brycek.wav

3 hours ago, Andres Ramos said:

I didn't know that this effect is entangled with the ring modulator.

Ooops - My apologies Mr. Ramos.

My old age and mixing memories got me confused 

You are correct. I was thinking of a spring box which does do reverb.

Ring mod does the voice of Dr. Who's Dalek.  Exterminate - Exterminate 

Ahhhh - the old Ring Modulator concept.

Nice

Addendum To FIle(s).

I took a slice from 33.63 - 43.63 seconds because I heard the word Twitter towards the end.

33.63-43.63.wav

10 minutes ago, Claudia Kremer said:

In second place, I said “ your name?”

Well you definitely got a name.  Its in the 3rd section I posted.

I also like Tom's title as well.

Ron

And finally, from 37.31 to the end of the audio file:

37.31-END.wav

Third section from 30.56 to 37.31 seconds:

I like this section.

30.56-37.31.wav

This is from 15.50 seconds to 32.76 seconds:

15.50-32.76.wav

Here is the first filtered section starting from the beginning of the clip to 17.42 seconds:

0.00-17.42.wav

On 7/26/2021 at 4:39 PM, Claudia Kremer said:

Hi, people.

I am new here and a beginner in EVP. I’ m brazilian. I recently did a test recording with an old radio. There was only noise. When I went to listen, I heard a female voice and thought I had tuned in a radio. But in some parts the voice seems to say “EVP” and “ conscious” . There also seems to be a male voice speaking in portuguese. I would like your opinion. Thanks a lot. 

Greetings Claudia,

I'm glad you stopped by to visit and hope your time here is well spent.

Thank you for submitting your file.  There are many many layers of voices to hear.

Its not unusual to find responses in languages other than your own native language.

What I did was break up your file into 4 sections.

Each section is titled by its time index within the the clip.

There is some overlap to include your question.

I'd be happy to post my interpretation of what I hear.

By the way - What questions did you ask?

Ron

11 hours ago, Lance Reed said:

Oh Frightening stuff!! I will not be using that again, Thanks Andres.

Lance,  seems to me that if you're comfortable using audacity then uninstall the newest version and just run an older version of audacity. 

You can still get older versions of audacity going back years.

Kinda like the way you use audition 3.0. 

Truth be told - I run audition 1.5 and it does everything I want it to.

Ron

2 hours ago, Lance Reed said:

Hey thanks Ron for the feedback, much appreciated..
BTW Vicki Talbot told me to say hi to you

Take care, Lance. 

Charlene and I miss talking with Vicki and seeing her at the conferences.  Tell her I hope she's doing good and also to say hi to Braden for us.

Also Lance........

What ever happened to Kat Perkins.  Remember her UK site back in the 1990's.  I think that where I first met you and Keith.

Ron

Very very nice Lance.  I like how accents seem to come through as well.

Ron

Greetings,

Welcome to the forum.

What program do you use to filter the files with?

Ron

Excellent read !!

On 7/4/2021 at 3:58 AM, Andres Ramos said:

Wow Ron, this looks like an impressing radio station recording studio! Are all those fans for background support? Thanks for the "ancient" recordings. I heard something different but definetly a spirit voice saying "We are here" overlayed on the voice of the speaker.

Thanks for listening.

I'm not sure what you mean about fans,  If you're talking about the 3 circular things behind the equipment rack - those are parabolic dishes I used in conjunction with different microphones.

I figured that if I'll be haunting these halls for a couple more days I'd bump this thread to the top to see if anyone else has any ideas.

As for other observations - you can't discount the internal noise of the recorder / mic with or without a diode for a mic source.

I've reviewed recordings with evp's made inside an anechoic chamber.  You'd think there would be nothing there but the noise of the recorder's mic was present as were the evp's.

Speaking of which...there is a building at arizona state university that is both a giant faraday cage and anechoic chamber.  Once...upon asking a friend of mine who is a professor there if I could gain access for about 15 minutes I was told no because the building is basically used by Nasa and other corporate entities who pay for access.

Then there's the shielding issue with the wiring.  Remember the old Panasonic RR DR-60 and how it was the cat's meow for evp's? No shielding at all to that thing.

Also - there's all the crap in the air. TV - Satellite - AM - FM - Short Wave - Cell towers - radar - etc.  We're blanketed 24 hrs a day by that and all mother nature can throw at us.

Some of my equipment includes various dynamic, condenser and ribbon mics.  I used them in conjunction with a denoiser, 24 band EQ, isolation transformers and a mixer with shielded cables as well as 2 foot parabolic lenses with a 4 inch focal point.  Talk about being able to hear a flea fart.

Through it all I couldn't get rid of the noise with out the noise gate. No noise --- no evp's.

Of course I could be wrong.  I've been wrong plenty of times - just ask my wife 

11 hours ago, Andres Ramos said:

Ron, you must have done a tremendous amount of work to scan the archived material. What were the earliest evident of EVP you have found?

Well...for me at least - once I got to the point where I was getting evp's in my own recordings I branched out to seek out unsolicited evp's.

From  youtube to 911 calls to body cam video to moment of death video to hydrophone recordings to police interviews like the ones released in the Casey Anthony missing child case to airline crash black box recordings to Nasa archives and beyond I wanted to hear for myself.

And yep - they've been talking for quite some time.

The Slave Narratives recordings at the library of congress had interesting evp's as did some of the Nasa archives.

As for the earliest - I'd have to say it was the Disk 1 recording of Charles Sumner Tainter from Oct 1881.

More info can be found here:  http://www.firstsounds.org/research/volta.php

In this recording which I have attached - it starts with a person trilling their "R's" then counting from 1 to 6 then trilling the "R's" again.

Toward the end of the recording at approximately 8 1/2 second mark I heard a faint evp.

Upon filtering that segment I was pleased to hear the whole phrase.

The files include the original recording - the filtered evp - the filtered evp looped 3x and a pic of what I hear.

There are other early recordings with evp's but none that seemed to have that hide and seek quality of response that made me smile.

Hope y'all can hear it.

Ron

312119_Lateral_Electroplated_Disc-120-ORIGINAL.wav 312119_Lateral_Electroplated_Disc-121-SEGMENT-FILTERED EVP.wav 312119_Lateral_Electroplated_Disc-121-EVP - LOOP 3X.wav

Greetings,

Question 1  -  Yes I have recorded the same evp on multiple recorders.

Question 2  -  Yes I have recorded evp with a recorder placed inside a Faraday cage.

Question 3  -  I have reviewed recordings of recorders placed inside a vacuum bell jar at vacuum.  Kieth has a vacuum rig. For sustained experiments I always thought a desiccator would be a good choice because they are larger and you could introduce different gasses to see if they improve responses.

Peeps finding evp within background noise has been around for a long time.  I used to peruse national archive recordings and found evp in the earliest recordings.

AtransC did a white paper which touches on the subject of transform or opportunistic evp:

https://atransc.org/itc-white-paper/#_Toc48739566

With things like fireworks - gunshots - lightening / thunder and the doppler effect of a passing police or ambulance siren...evp can be heard about 2 - 5 seconds after the apex of the sound starts to recede.

Wind gusts are a good source.  For a slightly controlled scenario would be to record on a windy day inside a bathroom or other room with a vent to the roof.  That way you can get a fairly consistent level of wind noise that does not overpower the sound level.

I like wind because it produces VLF.

Flowing / dripping water is also good.  It produces ultrasound.

Record on a windy day near a waterfall and you got your bases covered 

Ron

Thank you for your response.

I understand about the subtitles.  I was wondering what prompted the person to say:  "send your love...who are we sending it to"

You might be correct about the sing-song responses.  I have heard plenty of those type responses in various recordings.

Thanks for the info on the pie pan.

Ron

Greetings Cindy,

Welcome to the forum.

In your youtube video from the VFW - you appeared to look at your laptop and said  "send your love...who are we sending it to"

Were responses showing in text on the screen or was that your comment trying to elicit a response.

So - your running VR Ghostbox on your laptop and using an external speaker. Nice.

Also....what is the pie pan used for?

Keep up the good work.

Ron

Please feel free to ask the questions in any manner you see fit.

As for the gateway, I'd prefer to wait till the question is answered.

Many Thanks,

Ron

9 hours ago, Paul Hamden said:

Hi Ron

Where did you hear the words Gateway Central? (I've not heard that term before) The Zetas wouldn't understand that term. Are you referring to the Gateway?

And Dimensions are relative to the entities abilities to perceive layers of frequency via consciousness

 

regards

Greetings Paul,

My questions are solely based on your statement:

"The Zetas have asked that we get a list of questions from the public. These questions can cover any area."

Gateway Central is a term I have heard in different EVP's I've received.

Asking about Dimensions is a question myself and other researchers have asked over the years - the various answers fall within an approximate range of each other.

Ron